The Devil's Advocate®
Legal Fee Management & Litigation Consulting

DA Home

Welcome:

Devil's Advocate Home

What's Hot at DA

Contacts/Questions (FAQ)
Legal Fee Whistleblower
Lawyer Complaints
Feedback

E-Mail to DA

Important Notices

Who We Are:

Our Staff
Care to Join Us?

What We Do:

Our Services
We're Uniquely Qualified
Independent Counsel™

Articles & Publications:

Legal Fees: Law & Management

Client's Bill of Rights™

Managing Legal Fees
Client-Friendly
Billing Agreement
DA in the Press
Articles by DA

Presentations:

Slide Presentations

Last update: 04/29/08

Our 15th Year

 

 

 

Quotes from:

Amtrak's Lesson: Check Legal Bills Closely

Wall Street Journal
November 4, 2006; Page B1

By Nathan Koppel and Ashby Jones

© Copyright 2006 WSJ


It can pay to read bills closely before signing the check.

That's the moral of a recent audit of Amtrak's legal bills, which found that the railroad allowed law firms to disregard its billing guidelines -- potentially costing Amtrak millions of dollars. From 2002 to 2005, Amtrak spent more than $100 million on lawyers, records show. But "with better management, Amtrak could have knocked [down] its legal fees" substantially, says John Toothman, an examiner hired by Amtrak's Office of the Inspector General to draft the report. ...

Mr. Toothman studied samples of legal bills submitted by six of Amtrak's main law firms, including Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Shaw Pittman (now known as Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, following a 2005 merger). The firms billed the company a combined $19 million from 2002 to 2005, records show.

Mr. Toothman's report found that 41% of the fees Shaw Pittman requested, in the sample studied, had "cryptic" descriptions. ...

The report cited Manatt, Phelps for a pattern of repetitive hourly billings. In 2004, for example, a firm paralegal billed exactly 9.0 hours on 10 different occasions in one month, according to Mr. Toothman. He found it unusual that none were, say, "8.9" or "9.1" hours. ...

Another issue is that in-house lawyers and outside firms often have longstanding relationships. In the Amtrak case, "the attitude of the law department was that they shouldn't manage the [outside] law firms, because they were their buddies," says Mr. Toothman. One lawyer, who was working for Amtrak at the time, Mr. Toothman says, supervised a law firm where she had previously worked. In another instance, he says, Amtrak used a law firm headed by a former Amtrak in-house counsel. ...

 



www.DevilsAdvocate.com:   Home

For more information, contact our Marketing Director,
Elizabeth McGee
The Devil's Advocate, PO Box 8, Great Falls, Virginia 22066
Phone: (703) 684-6996 * Fax: (703) 759-2388 * E-mail: Devil's Advocate

Conditions for site use & important notices
The Devil's Advocate® is a registered trademark, and Independent Counsel, and the Client Bill of Rights™ are trademarks
of The Devil's Advocate.  All materials in this web-site copyright April, 2008 by The Devil's Advocate (licensed to Devil's Advocate, LLC). All rights reserved.
We do not provide advice by e-mail or through this site.